Archive

Archive for the ‘Tampa Commercial Real Estate News and Commentary’ Category

Trends in Office Space: Co-Working

January 14th, 2012 No comments

Attendees:        Eric Odum with Ken Evans, Principal at Evolution Advisors

Date:                January 9, 2012

Subject:            The Market Minute

EO:      Good afternoon and welcome to today’s Market Minute. I’m Eric Odum, principal Real Estate Broker for Net Lease Commercial Advisory. Today we have Ken Evans with us. Ken is a friend of mine now, but we originally met three years ago. Ken came to us for office space and it was the first time I had worked with somebody in his industry. Ken has been in technology for 30 years and his expertise lies in technology development and product development (software). He’s from New York originally, he has worked in Atlanta, he was part of the big Seattle Tech scene, and now he’s in Tampa. Ken was one of the first people to bring the ‘co-working‘ concept to the Tampa Bay area and that’s what we’re going to talk about today.   So, welcome Ken, appreciate your time with us.

EO: So, you originally came to Net Lease to talk about office space and I was unaware of the issues affecting the Tech industry at the time and how technology companies were dealing with office space. I think the truth is, today, the biggest issue is that landlords do notknow how to adapt to the tech industry because they have very distinctive needs, don’t they?

KE: They do, and any small business has distinctive needs but by the very fact that technology companies are volatile, they also experience very high growth. When they catch on, they grow substantially in size. They have little need for distribution, warehousing, and manufacturing but in so far as staffing, they must expand very quickly when things do catch on. So with regards traditional office space as we know it, and projecting how big the tech company is going to be in the next few years, that scenario really doesn’t apply in the technology industry. Most of the time in the tech industry, people get together and you find a number of companies under 0ne roof until one of them spins out, which is one of the benefits of co-working. People work together in an office environment, the idea catches and the company and founders spin out and do their own thing.

EO:      So if I understand correctly, essentially what happens is; you have an individual, he has an idea, the guy in the garage, the Steve Jobs type, and he graduates. He/she graduates and then they collaborate with other people. They then go the next step and go from maybe two or three people in a small office space, to 20 people working for them in year two and to 100 people working for them in year three.

KE:      It can go that way, those cases are unusual – not everyone is going to be a Google or a Facebook, but they do grow very quickly when things catch on because the market takes over. If you don’t keep up with market demand, your competition will step in and take that share, so you do have to grow very quickly. Generally nowadays, tech companies start virtually, especially in the last couple of years, because it means you don’t have to invest in infrastructure, practically everything you need is available virtually and on line, as in on “The Cloud”. So all you really need is people. Most of the time it starts with people working remotely in their garage or in their living room.

EO:      And those are people who can’t afford to sign a three year lease, right? It’s just impossible.

KE:      No, they can’t and they don’t need to. You don’t want the fixed costs when you’re starting a new business. I’ve done a number of workshops and a lot of work with emerging tech companies and that’s the one thing you want to avoid – a lease and office space is a fixed cost. What you need to be doing is plowing any capital you have, whether it’s maxing out your credit cards or spending a little bit of seed capital from an investor,  into the development of your product and your customer.

EO:      So let’s talk a little bit about co-working because you originally introduced me to the idea. Tell me about what stage co-working is typically suited to the company development process.

KE:      We see it for all stages of the development process. We were actually doing co-working when I came to you three years ago. We were doing co-working on an ad hoc basis in coffee shops where we would get together for a mini workshop or session, and people could come and discuss what challenges they had, what they were working on and ask for help from other people in the tech community.  Co-working appeals to a broad range of people, from the individual that’s working on the idea, to the person that is actually growing the business. This doesn’t necessarily mean that a business owner is adding staff because people don’t add staff like they used to. They’re not adding full time employees; for example W-2 employees. They are adding 1099 freelancers because they have project based work. They are designing new web products, doing graphic design work, or web programming so they d0n’t need a full time hire. So, again, avoiding the fixed cost is a key component.

EO:      Let’s back up a bit here and define co-working. If you’re a landlord and you’re listening to this, how would you explain co-working to them?

KE:      Co-working is an office space where people can get together and use a desk for a day. That is probably the best way to describe it. Co-working started out in New York and the Bay Area at pretty much the same time….

EO:      San Francisco Bay Area

KE: …yes, and a creative agency, a marketing agency, or ad agency would have extra space and would work with a lot of freelancers and web developers, and they would rent them a desk. This would cover the cost of that desk, allow someone to come in and use the facility, and that agency could use their capabilities and work side by side with other people working on similar projects. That creation of critical mass, the gathering of people all doing similar things, creates a creative spark for people to work together and it’s better than working alone. Sitting at home on your couch with your cat doesn’t really do much for the creative process.

EO:      And it’s happening now at places like Panera Bread or Starbucks.

KE:      It happens at Panera around the country and at Starbucks, but those businesses have pulled back on catering for people that are keeping a seat for hours on end. Starbucks and Panera have closed off their Wi-Fi accesses during lunch – they are really trying to push people through and get traffic, so those coffee shops are not as friendly as they used to be. So people are moving to other locations where they can get together, which is why co-working has cropped up in a number of different areas.  Its been very popular in dense urban areas like New York and San Francisco, but really it’s happening all around the world.

EO:      Well what was interesting to me was the first time you introduced me to co-working, I said “that’s not going to work – it’s not viable” (for the landlord), but then my phone started ringing and everybody was asking for spaces to ‘co-work’. There were so many unemployed people, and people that had been laid off. They were all trying to get back to work instead of hanging around in their pajamas all day. And the vast majority were advertising people, marketing people, attorneys, tech people, it was amazing! You also had the landlords in the Tampa area, accustomed to getting $23/sq. ft on their space; and all of a sudden you had all these displaced workers and suddenly there’s a disconnect because the workers were let go and vacancy is increasing. The workers are still present….. Just not with the same company. You have to figure out a way to get them back into your space.  Why don’t you talk about that a little bit? If you’re a landlord, how do you handle all these 1099 workers?

KE:      The way you handle the displaced worker is, if there’s a migration – and this doesn’t apply to people looking for jobs, or people out of work – but those that have made a shift from being a W-2 worker to being a 1099 (a freelancer), when they’ve made that shift, they will need a work space, but they’re not going to step up to a lease because of the financial commitment. If a landlord can only provide a space of 5000/ sq.ft or more, it’s completely impractical for the small business owner. In fact it’s no longer practical for the Tampa Bay Area, because we don’t really have employers of that size any more (moving to the area), so it’s just not practical for a workforce that has moved from predominantly being W-2’s to being 1099’s. Freelancers are going to want very flexible terms; and flexible office space. Co-working is one of the things you can do to achieve that, Executive Suites is another, and then there’s a middle ground between executive suites, which costs $800 to $1,000 per month, and an office space with open areas, so essentially, the work force is driving a new type of office adoption. So it’s really not about the landlords adjusting to the number of people, but rather to new businesses, the solo entrepreneurs/two person shops that don’t require a traditional lease.

EO:      It’s interesting you bring this up, I think it’s something that really should have started happening in 2000. It’s not an issue of a bad economy, it goes much deeper than that. Technology now allows people to work from home or out of the traditional office environment, and to say “Ok, I don’t need employees in my office 24/7/365.” I can use a freelancer and communicate with them just as effectively. So there is definitely a changing work force and technology has allowed that to happen (with Skype, email, etc.).  So it really comes down to one issue [from a landlord's perspective] – they need to figure out how to adapt to this change. It’s not going to go back to the way it was in 1985.

KE:      That’s right.  And this has been coming for a long time. In 1994 Compaq got rid of a lot of their sales force and said ‘you go work from home, you should be outbound x number of days per week.’ So they got all their sales people together and said ‘we’re going to build you home offices, and we expect you to be on the road.’ A couple years after that, IBM followed suit, they did what was called “Hoteling.” They had an office where people could have a desk for a day, but the sales team didn’t need to go in to the office every day, so IBM offices shrunk dramatically. That was then followed by the ‘telecommuting‘ idea in the commercial sector. I think the Government is trying to encourage this practice – it has done a significant number of studies and put programs in place for their employees to telecommute. They don’t want people in the office and they don’t want people on the roads.

EO:      You see law firms here too…

KE:      Absolutely.

EO:      …where associates are sharing office space and the lawyers only go in when they need to meet with a client. At Net Lease, I get those types of requests all the time. It’s really remarkable seeing the pressure on the downtown Tampa market because these law firms have shrunk in terms of space requirement. Law firms used to be enormous consumers of space because of the paper work they had to store and the amount of associates they had to accommodate. They are now finding ways to economize. So it’s even happening in law firms as well. The Tech industry has always been a little bit more on the edge, but you’re seeing the more traditional types of business follow suit.

KE:      The footprint has shrunk across all industries. Tech has done it, law offices, accounting offices, they’ve all done it; they just don’t need to have a lease or a formal office.  You can start in your living room. At some point you’re going to want to work with other people and that’s where co-working and executive office suites come in. Tech companies are not going to consume the same amount of office space they traditionally did.

EO:      We are actually sitting in a co-working space today. Do you want to talk about that a little bit?

KE:      We are sitting in Tampa’s newest co-working space, a space started by Tampa Web Ventures, or Tampa Bay WaVE. They have approximately 40 small tech companies that are all members of this organization. It’s a peer group, a support group of people that are all building web ventures together. They meet on a monthly basis and support each other and share ideas, war stories and their advice on how to do certain things. They were able find a landlord willing to give them some space to take their companies to the next level. So as part of that, there would have been some co-working involved. The organization is not just made up of companies, there are individuals as well: web designers, web developers, freelancers etc., that will be using this space to come in, rent a desk for a day, sit on a couch to enjoy free Wi-Fi and some coffee and just add to the critical mass that this type of space caters for, without having to go to a Panera or somewhere like that. And it’s not just about a place to sit, it’s about sharing ideas and collaborating and, as we’ve seen with co-working, a lot of good ideas, products and companies have spawned from that creative critical mass.

EO:      So essentially, just to summarize, for those landlords out there wondering what to do with their space, not every space is going to be ideally suited for co-working, but co-working definitely suits that type of creative 1099 individual that needs to collaborate with somebody. It could be a win-win situation for both landlords and the individual entrepreneur alike. So if I’m hearing you properly, that’s the direction things are headed in.

KE:      Well the market has adjusted down, so really, if the market is a lot of solo entrepreneurs, whether they are tech employees or attorneys, the market has shifted regardless. This has happened across the country and around the world. It has certainly happened in Tampa, where we are heavily dependent on the service industry, tourism, and construction – that market has shifted significantly, so a lot of those people working for big companies, or for medium size companies are very different to solo entrepreneurs because entrepreneurs are not going to be looking for traditional office space, leases, and the traditional footprint. So really my advice to your clients is to adjust down to the market because that is the growth curve going forward.

EO:      Ken, appreciate having you today, appreciate your input. I know you’re out there every day trying to help the cause of the entrepreneur and we appreciate your time today.

KE:      Happy to be here. Thanks.

Keep up with future guest interviews on our Facebook page covering Commercial Real Estate for the Tampa Bay Area!

Share

Gov. Scott Should Just Keep His Mouth Closed About High Speed Rail

November 11th, 2011 2 comments

The news today out of California that High Speed Rail cost estimates have now tripled to the $100 billion range reinforces that Florida made the right decision earlier this year to protect taxpayers from just this sort of boondoggle. As I said at the time, High Speed Rail (HSR) would be far too costly to taxpayers and I believe the risk far outweighs the benefits. Im glad Florida is no longer entangled in the high speed spending web.

This was the release from the Governor’s Office last week.  Scott has been under fire recently for not doing enough to increase the sluggish Florida economy.  The timing of the release was awkward and it comes off as defensive.

I am sure the comments will make his Tea Party base happy, but the reality is, it just reinforces to those close to the project that the the Governor’s decision to reject the Federal dollars for High Speed Rail was based more on knee jerk, political ideology than actual facts.  At best, it is disingenuous of the Governor to compare the California debacle with what was proposed in Florida. Right of way issues are the primary challenge with California. Florida’s HSR right of way issues had already been solved.

Folks in Florida that cheered Scott’s decision tend to confuse the issues.  The question of, “Would the project have been good for Florida?” became blurred with, “Would HSR work?”  Analyzing the facts, it is hard to debate that the project would not have been good for Florida.  With the stroke of a pen, Scott killed 20,000 jobs in a State desperate for some positive job news.  Commercial real estate development along the HSR/I-4 Corridor would have added even more to the economic equation.  ”Would it have worked?” is a more valid question to which no one has the answer.  But, in the scope of things, there was no better place to attempt HSR than on a relatively short track between Tampa and Orlando.

Shortly after Scott’s rejection of Federal HSR money, he approved a State sponsored rail system in Orlando (Sun Rail), which is one of the lowest rated rail projects in the country. The initial cost of Sunrail to the State is also many times higher than the State’s proposed share of HSR costs.  On the surface, this was a deal that logically Scott should have killed with the same swiftness that he killed HSR.  The difference is SunRail was backed and promoted by Republican John Mika. HSR was an Obama initiative.  The two decisions showed how quickly Scott could turn his back on principals in favor of partisan politics.  We the people of Florida will have to pay for the Orlando train for eternity.   The cost of HSR was a national initiative and had far less downside financial consequences for the people of this State.

Sadly, Florida was the loser in this partisan game.   In the future, Governor Scott might consider restraining from making further comments about his high speed rail decision, considering his inconsistencies on the subject of rail.

Share

3rd Quarter 2011 – Tampa Area Commercial Real Estate Sales of Interest

November 4th, 2011 2 comments

Sun city

Address 4896 Sun City Center Blvd.
Property Type McDonald’s
Sales Date 08/30/2011
Sales Amount $1,735,700
Amount/Sq Ft $403.28
Prior Sale Amount $745,000
Prior Sales Date 08/16/05
Exterior Wall Stucco
Winding

Address 14914 Winding Creek Ct.
Property Type Office
Sales Date 09/09/2011
Sales Amount $1,200,000
Amount/Sq Ft $184.67
Prior Sale Amount $340,000
Prior Sales Date Sep 82
Exterior Wall Stucco
Lots

Address 934/940 Channelside Dr.
Property Type Parking Lot
Sales Date 08/26/2011
Sales Amount $955,000
Amount/Sq Ft n/a
Prior Sale Amount $275,000
Prior Sales Date 02/05/2001
Exterior Wall n/a
Last one

Address 10402 N 56TH St.
Property Type Office
Sales Date 05/18/2011
Sales Amount $9,700,000
Amount/Sq Ft $169.15
Prior Sale Amount $2,600,000
Prior Sales Date 9/28/2009
Exterior Wall Stucco

13909 N. Dale Mabry Hwy

Address 10402 N 56TH St.
Property Type Advanced Auto Parts – Retail Net Lease
Sales Date 05/18/2011
Sales Amount $9,700,00
Amount/Sq Ft $169.15
Prior Sale Amount $2,600,000
Prior Sales Date 9/28/2009
Exterior Wall Stucco
Share

Department of Revenue Tax on Tenant Improvements

October 12th, 2011 No comments

For any interested parties, this is the letter sent to the members of the Florida Gulf Coast Commercial Association of Realtors (Please take a moment to contact your legislators):

FROM GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: Please read and take action to defeat this proposed tax.

Dear Interested Party and Fellow Brokers;

The Department of Revenue is trying to impose sales tax on Tenant Improvements.

This includes any and all real estate that incorporates tenants. This tax is in addition to the sales tax paid on the materials to build the tenant improvements and the real estate tax paid on the improvements.

Please assist us in defeating this tax on tax. A form letter is printed below, listing who to send it to, and who to copy it to.  Attached is a list of our legislators, too. Please spend a few minutes assisting us in defeating this outrageous attempt to double tax our industry. We need your help.

Receipt deadline is October 20  so it must be sent by October 15, 2011 to safely reach Tallahassee.  If so inclined, feel free to change the wording.

Also feel free to call any politician you know and voice your opinion on this issue. Get involved and thank you in advance.

Sincerely,
FGCAR, NAIOP, BOMA, CBA,
FR and others

Any questions?  Feel free to call Bob Zegota at 813-263-4867 or Avi Adler at 813-463-3618

Letter to DOR:

French Brown
Deputy Director, Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution
Department of Revenue
PO Box 7443.
Tallahassee, Florida 32314-7443

Dear Department of Revenue:

On September 21, 2011 a workshop was held to determine whether to charge Sales tax on tenant improvements for commercial real estate projects.
According to the State Statute 212.031 (2) (b):
(b)  It is the further intent of this Legislature that only one tax be collected on the rental or license fee payable for the occupancy or use of any such property, that the tax so collected shall not be pyramided by a progression of transactions, and that the amount of the tax due the state shall not be decreased by any such progression of transactions.

This proposed rule is not only in conflict with the law as stated above, but also bad for small business in Florida for the following reasons:

  • It is double taxation or pyramiding as referenced in the statute.
  • Tenant improvements are 2 components, materials and labor. Materials are already sales taxed. Labor is taxed in many other aspects of government. Given the current economic climate, some landlords do not have capital to perform improvements on behalf of potential tenants. So the tenants do it to improve their business climate. They too then would experience double taxation. In this market, profit margins are marginal.  A 6-7% variance of costs to a tenant or landlord can make or break a deal.
  • Once improvements are made, the Property appraiser reassesses the property to include tenant improvements in property taxes. Your proposal taxes this tax resulting indouble taxation. Tenant improvements are tenant specific. Once a tenant vacates, the tenant improvements have little, if any, residual value to the property. The lease itself is already taxed at 6-7% including CAM charges which are also made up of taxes and insurance and are normally tax exempt. Many leases include the costs of tenant improvements amortized over the life of the lease.
  • Cost of government and add on taxes have already devastated the commercial real estate industry. CRE is sales taxed, property taxed, corporate taxed, utility taxed, income taxed, license taxed, and so on. One more tax could bury an already struggling industry.
  • Taxes are already running amuck. Attempting to add another tax to items that are either already taxed or in other instances exempted, places an unfair burden on a narrow segment of the business population in our state. Our Governor promised no new taxes. Why would you attempt this in these trying times?

    I wish to go on record as a person who adamantly opposes any new tax of any sort, especially those taxes which are nothing more than double taxation.

    Sincerely,

    Cc: Governor Rick Scott
    My Legislator

    =================================================

    Information Sheet
    Send your letter to:
    French Brown
    Deputy Director, Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution
    Department of Revenue
    PO Box 7443.
    Tallahassee, Florida 32314-7443
    Email: Rulecomments@dor.state.fl.us
    In subject line include 12A-1.070 Workshop 9-21-11

    And:

    Office of Governor Rick Scott
    State of Florida
    The Capitol
    400 S. Monroe St
    Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001
    (850) 488-7146
    His e-mail:
    Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com

    Legislators: See Attached

    Please copy any letters, emails or anything else to DORchallenge@gmail.com

This is to insure they receive everything and that we can track who and how many are involved. Your information will not be used for anything but this task
and will be kept otherwise confidential

DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT
BY DOR IS October 20,2011.

Share

ICSC Florida Conference – 2011

August 23rd, 2011 1 comment

ICSC Florida 2011

It was my first trip back to the annual Orlando conference in three years.  Since the beginning of the 3+ year old downturn in the real estate market, I, like many of my colleagues, had steered clear of the conference, deciding not to invest the time or money in the face of stiff economic resistance and little chance for deal consummation. While the economic ice appeared to be cracking several quarters ago, I thought it was time for me to make like Punxsutawney Phil and explore the Spring thaw.ICSC Florida Conference 2011

Here are a couple of my thoughts of the conference and an overview of the first session of the day on Monday, the Florida Regional Overview.

  • Conference planners estimated that there was an increase of 10% in attendance from the previous year.
  • The gloom and doom was gone from the last time I attended in 2008.  I am not sure what that means other than perhaps people are becoming more comfortable with the new norm.
  • The mix at the Expo appeared lighter than usual with developers and heavier than usual with brokers.
  • One of the reasons I have enjoyed this conference in past years was the introduction to new technology and services.  With brokers and developers having less disposable income these days for technology investment and retailer expansion muted, it should come as no surprise that the conference was almost devoid of new technology.  Some of the well known established service providers apparently decided not to attend either.
  • Most of the Economic Development teams in the State were present.  Hillsborough County, City of Tampa and Tampa Bay Partnership were noticeably absent.  Orlando had a terrific booth, full of education about how to invest in the area and what incentives are available.
  • Miami seems to be recovering faster than the rest of the State.  The weak dollar has definitely been a help with foreign investors from Brazil and Europe.

All that said, the mood was upbeat and optimistic.  While deals are hard to come by, many were out with their wish lists, trying to find the perfect match.  I hope it was a productive conference for all in attendance.  I know I was glad to feel like I was officially back in the game.

Here are some photos from the Facebook page of the good folks at ICSC…

************************************************************

Florida Regional Overview

Monday, August 22, 2011

8:00 am – 9:00 am

Mayor Richard Crotty, former Orange Count Mayor

“Government needs to have more efficient regulation as opposed to less regulation.” Industry is unified in Central Florida unlike in other places in the State….Amway Center was used as an example.

Kieran Quinn, from Guggenheim Partners,

Florida has not done a great job of creating careers in Florida. Great universities… but not a great job of keeping graduates.

Regarding Real Estate:  Retail on “First and Main” is not much of a concern.  Demand will always be there.  Office is on shaky ground.

Tim Becker from the University of  Florida,

Capital markets are going to be shaken up by S&P downgrade, Politics, Europe etc.

CMBS Origination will not reach $50 billion this year. There was a big hiccup due to political impasse and economic uncertainty.

Life Insurance companies will be overweight real-estate, if stock market continues to drop. This will slow activity and take key buyers out of the market.

Q2 dip in UF sentiment, due to capital markets and political uncertainty. Fundamentals are pretty good actually, compared to previous years.

Innovation Square is the most exciting project in the State…it has the concept of creating careers for people in our State.

"Juniors" Break Out Session

"Juniors" Break Out Session

Suk Sing from Darden

Tertiary malls are having the most problems.

Restaurants, entertainment and fitness centers, which are activity based, are highly valued.  Retailers want shoppers to stick around. The longer they stick around, the more likely they are to buy at other shops.

There is an oversupply of secondary and tertiary space with a shortage on prime locations. There is an increased focus on second generation space.

Land Assemblage is back.  In-Fill skills are important.

Lenders are very focused on leases right now. Deals are taking two years to complete because of increased scrutiny from government and lenders.

Hot retailers like Wawa, Desigual, Lulu Lemon are expanding.  Globalization and more specialization is what is happening in retail.

Share

Ken Stoltenberg Talks Grand Central & Tampa’s Channelside District

July 4th, 2011 2 comments

Attendees: Eric Odum with Ken Stoltenberg, Mercury Advisors

Date: May 31, 2011

Subject: The Commercial Real Estate Market Minute – Grand Central and Current Events in Tampa’s Channelside

EO: Welcome to today’s Market Minute. I’m Eric Odum, I’m the principal broker for Net

Channside - Grand Central @ Kennedy

Channside - Grand Central @ Kennedy

Lease Commercial Advisory, and today we have with us, Ken Stoltenberg from Mercury Advisors. I appreciate you sitting down with us and having a chat about what’s going on with your property today.

KS: Good to be here, Eric.

EO: For those that don’t know, Ken developed Grand Central which is in the Channelside District. You can’t miss it – brightly colored building as you’re driving down Kennedy Blvd.  into downtown.  It’s really an eye catcher.

KS: You need a vision exam if you miss it; let’s put it that way.

EO: Let’s talk about it because you had a unique path in sales and marketing of the building, because I think originally it was meant for sale…

KS: Correct.

EO: And then the market hit a little bit of a challenge, a little bit of a road bump, and you guys seem to be the first in the market to adjust. You adjusted pretty quickly to that situation. How did you handle that?

KS: We were closing into 2007.  We did very well in the East Building, which closed in the early part of the year, February.  In the West Building, we did not do nearly as well because that was closing in July/August.  At that point, the mortgage market was pretty much in full disintegration mode and a lot of people just couldn’t get loans. So, we saw this coming and didn’t really think it was going to be something that was just going to be a couple quarter event.  So, as soon as we closed the last unit, we hung out the “for rent” signs and into the rental business we went.  My partner and I have built apartment complexes, leased them and managed them for years, so that wasn’t something that we were unaccustomed to.

EO: So you were comfortable with the apartment complex situation and it was pretty natural for you to go from a sales situation over to an apartment situation.

KS: Absolutely.

EO: It’s interesting, because I know that you seem to be the first one to pull the trigger on that strategy.  Everybody that knows the market in Downtown Tampa knows there’s a lot of residential tower/condo development that was going on after you, but a lot of them seemed very late to the game to try to convert over to rentals. Do you think that’s a fair assessment?

KS: Yes, I would tell you that a few of them wanted to convert to rentals, but their lending institutions did not let them do it.  How we solved that problem was, we didn’t ask.

EO: You begged for forgiveness?

KS: Yes.

EO: Well, the end result, you are 98% occupied right now?

KS: That is correct.

EO: We were talking a little bit earlier about it.  You managed to sell about 50% of the entire amount of the residential space, and then 48% of it you turned into rentals.  So, you are pretty much a full house now.

KS: Well, obviously we are going to start up our sales program, and we do have a lot of leases rolling over the next three months, which will give us the inventory we need to go forward on our sales program.

EO: Let’s talk about that a little bit.  You said you are going to try to switch over now to go back into selling some of these units.

KS: Yes, it’s back to the future.

EO: How is that going to work? Was there a re-pricing of the model, or is it at the price it was before? How is that working?
KS: Well we were able to restructure things at the end of last year financial with the entire project, which is going to allow us to sell units at today’s prices, which are obviously significantly below where they were in 2005/2006.

EO: It’s a pretty cool place to live, and I suppose your target market is young professionals looking for an urban environment, is that fair?

KS: Actually, that’s part of the market, but the demographic actually skews a little bit older than people think.  It’s not a bunch of twenty-something’s running around here.  It’s much more people in their 30’s 40’s and 50’s.

EO: So, if somebody wanted to move in here, (i.e., Young Lawyer), what is his/her first option to come in here in terms of price point?

KS: Our pricing is very attractive. It’s starting in the $120’s which is really the lowest price point that has been seen in this market for luxury high rise living in an urban setting. All of our residences are priced between $120k and the high $300’s, with the majority being under $200,000.  So, it’s very affordable for your average, working downtown, pulling down $50,000 to $100,000 per year. You can afford to live here and pretty much have run of the roost.

EO: What do you think in terms of time frame for you to be completely out, in terms of being able to sell out the rest of the space?

KS: Well, obviously we don’t know what is going to drive that.  But, we think that within 18 months to 24 months, we should be through the inventory here, and we’ll see what the future holds.

EO: This is a mixed use complex for those that don’t know, not just residential. Residential makes up about 75% of the floor space, no?

KS: A little bit less than that. We have about 70,000 sq. feet of office space and about 108,000 sq. feet of retail space. So, it truly is Tampa’s only mixed use urban project. Some other high rises have a couple stores down on the first level. We have a 70,000 sq. foot office building on the second floor of the building and a full shopping center on the first floor. Now my background is originally retail. When I got out of college I went to work for Leo Eisenberg and at the time we were the largest Wal-Mart developer in the country.  So, I learned a thing or two about what retailers need, and that was some of the things we incorporated in this complex, which is proving to make the retail successful. The single biggest aspect is building enough parking; the city regulations did not require me to build but 3 per 1,000 for retail and 1 per 1,000 for office dwelling. Well…that dog simply won’t hunt. So, we have 900 parking spaces dedicated to the retail and the office.  Part of the reason we put structured the parking this way is office is busy when the retail is not. So, we double use that parking.  We effectively have a parking ratio for the retail on evenings and weekends of about 8:1, and since Wal-Mart only requires 7:1…. I figure we were probably safe there.

EO: And you have the gym you put downstairs, and they seem to be knocking it out of the park.

KS: Yes, they were our first retail tenant. They opened in June, 2009; they have now expanded three times.  We’re about to expand them a fourth time, and the brothers who are the proprietors of that establishment are originally from California. They had five or six gyms in LA for a period of over 10 years, so they really know what they’re doing, and create a great atmosphere.  I would stick my neck out and say its Tampa premier fitness facility.

EO: You’ve also got the Pour House that’s downstairs as well.

KS: Yes, that’s a beer and wine bar that has over 40 craft beers on tap that are local micro-brewery’s that you won’t find anywhere else. They also have a nice wine selection, and it’s proved really popular.  Their sales are strong.  We put in just over a year ago, a whole courtyard in between the two buildings that has shade elements, pavers, umbrellas, and all the tenants that occupy space in that area, get a certain portion of the courtyard to use.  Last year, we wet zoned the entire property.  We ended up going downtown.  We got the liquor license thing.  We have done that for the entire property.  It really works out well, because it’s kind of a turn key situation for somebody who wants to open up a restaurant.   One of the things that (you have to make sure you have zoning, parking, and go through the whole process to get a liquor license…) is already done here. The only thing you really need to do as a potential proprietor is get your plans drawn up, send them into permitting and we’re ready to go.

The other thing that we have done, since this project was approved in 2005 is (this is a very significant economic factor for any business, but especially for restaurant businesses), we’re grandfathered in to the old impact fees.  We paid them all for the entire property.  The last restaurant that we put in – would they have had to pay the impact fee – was almost $8,000, and that’s already been paid…..was grandfathered in.  So it is pretty substantial.

EO: Well, it sounds like you’re just missing the grocery component to it, and there’s really no reason at that point for anybody to even leave the complex. You can work out, go drink a beer; you can go get grocery, dry cleaning…

KS: Well that would be great, and I have been working with a number of supermarkets for about two years now.  The biggest challenge that we’ve had, is not the location.  We’ve had three major chains that are here in Florida come look at the site. From a logistical standpoint and design standpoint, everything works. There’s enough parking.  There is room for transformers.  There is room for loading docks, all those kinds of things that you would normally see. We put all that in not knowing exactly who we were going to get. Obviously, if we would have had a little more input from a potential user that would have been helpful.  But, we’ve had three folks look at it and as a physical plant, everything checks out just fine. The biggest issue is just the overall economy of the area.  Retailers at that level are really watching the eggs they already have in their basket and making sure their existing stores are performing, and keeping their sales where they are, or increasing them a little bit.  Any type of new business development for those types of companies has been greatly curtailed in the past 36 months, so we ran into that (the economic pull back). That’s been the biggest issue.  I don’t have any doubt we will get a grocer. It’s just a question of when.

EO: What’s the straw that essentially breaks the proverbial camels back to instigate the grocer to start a new store?

KS: Well, I think the market is there. If you look at the channel district downtown at Harbor Island there are over 10,000 households and that seems to be the number that everybody looks at. So we’re about that point. I think what it’s going to take is maybe a couple more projects that are on the horizon, so somebody can say, “Hey, you know not only are we at the point, but we know we are going to be exceeding that within a period of 18 to 24 months.”

EO: You mention that there’s another project that’s coming into Channelside District, correct?

KS: Yes, the Related Companies from Miami have bought the old Sembler piece that’s about 2 blocks south of here and they plan to build 360 apartments.

EO: So you’re going to have additional 360 apartments coming in. What else is happening in the Channelside District that might be of interest to folks, coming down the pipeline?

KS: When we developed the property we donated about 6,000 sq. ft to Stageworks Theatre.  They are Tampa’s oldest professional theatre group.  They’ve been around for 23 years now and we donated space in the West building for a new theatre. They are going to open August 4th which is their first show. The construction is underway. We were able to help them secure a loan with the Bank of Tampa to get the rest of the build out done. Total project cost is about $1.2m and it’s going to be a first rate theatre. They are going to have over 180 shows a year. They also have a youth outreach program where they help underprivileged children, which is a really neat thing. They also offer the space for a conference or an event and you wanted a stadium seating venue, for a presentation, you could rent that space out.

EO: I should be careful saying this, because you’ll have every philanthropic organization pounding on your door, but you have always been very generous to the local arts scene, not only with Stageworks, but also with the Gasparilla Film Festival.  You donated office space to them.  I know that the Arts Community has been grateful for what you have done.

KS: With the theatre, or any type of Arts contribution, you can’t put a dollar figure on it – as far as how it enhances your project – but one thing I do know, is they’re going to have 180 shows a year, and they are also going to have an outreach program.  They will also open it up during the daytime for various business groups.

EO: It’s not all altruistic, there’s some business motivation there too.

KS: Those folks are going to want to go to a show, going to want to get a meal before or a drink afterwards, or cup of coffee or something like that. Anytime you can add eyeballs and footsteps to a retail project, that’s what you want to do. And this very effectively does that on more than 50% of the days of the year.

EO: That’s awesome. Well is there anything else you’d like to add about what’s happening in Channelside? I think there are apartments coming in?

KS: Yes, and the city has started construction down on Washington Street, building the first community park which is about 25,000 – 30,000 square feet.  That’s going to be a great addition. I believe it’s going to be done in October. The city has also now started the streetscape improvements on Washington St. They’re about halfway done right now and that will be done in October. That will really give folks – being in the development business, you want to everything done yesterday.  We have had the CRA, which is the Community Reinvestment Area since 2004 now, and this is really the first big project where the city’s gotten in there in and said they were going to put in the streetscape, the landscaping, and the lighting per comprehensive planning.  So when people come down here, they won’t see a bunch of dumpy warehouses with telephone poles hanging all over the place, and that type of thing. They‘re going to see a modern landscaped streetscape, so they can really get a sense of, “OK…Now I get an idea of what this place is going to look like!” These buildings have been up for almost 4 years now, and when people come down here they see a bunch of  beautiful buildings, and the rest looks like Beirut, and that is extremely unfortunate. Obviously we have a new sheriff at the rodeo, and we’re certainly hopeful that the Mayor is going to look at what’s going on down here, and whatever’s getting done gets done quicker, and gets more of it done.

EO: Is there anything else you’d like to leave us with today in terms of what’s happening downtown and maybe you’d like to let us know how if somebody’s interested in residential condo, how they could find out information?

KS: The easiest thing to do is go to our website which is www.notthesuburbs.com, and that will take you right to the website.  We have all of the units, all the floor plans.  You can print everything out in pdf.  We are getting on Facebook and Twitter, so you can check us out there.  If you want to learn more about the project, you can certainly do that, and its going to be interesting next year. There’s going to be a lot of pretty cool things happening. For some reason, I can’t put my finger on it, we’ve got more activity for the retail and the office, than we have had in three years. We just signed a lease with St. Leo University, about 16,000 square feet; they are locating their administrative offices, as well as 5,000 square feet of classroom space. That’s going to bring more people.  Obviously, the gym is very excited about that because of potential new members. I think the Channel District in the next several years is really going to be on the rebound again.

EO: Well good luck on the grocery store. I hope that you guys get something, I’m pulling for you because I live over in Harbor Island – you’d be the closest store to us over there. Hopefully that works out for you and good luck in moving along with your plans on the rest of the residential properties.  I hope all goes well for you over the next year.

KS: Absolutely.  Thank you.

Share

Tampa’s Beer Can Building Sold in Foreclosure

July 2nd, 2011 No comments

RivergateTowerDowntown’s iconic “Beer Can” building recently sold for about $22 million in a foreclosure sale after fetching $35.5 million during the real estate boom in 2005.

Palm Beach County-based In-Rel Properties bought the 31-story cylindrical office tower at 400 N Ashley Drive from the Royal Bank of Scotland. Royal seized the tower in February from America’s Capital Partners of Miami after it defaulted on a $48.4 million loan.

Share

March 2011 Sales of Interest

April 19th, 2011 No comments

6160 Gunn Hwy TAMPA FL 33625

Address Gunn Hwy Tampa, FL 33625
Property Type Retail Shops
Sales Date 3/8/2011
Sales Amount $1,750,000
Amount/Sq Ft $110.51
Prior Sale Amount N/A
Prior Sales Date N/A
Exterior Wall Stucco

10412 N Dale Mabry Hwy

Address N. Dale Mabry Hwy Tampa, FL
Property Type Strip Commercial
Sales Date 3/25/2011
Sales Amount $1,500,000
Amount/Sq Ft $131.63
Prior Sale Amount $1,505,000
Prior Sales Date 4/30/2001
Exterior Wall Stucco

3802 Corporex Park

Address Corporex Park Dr. Tampa, FL 33619
Property Type Office Building
Sales Date 3/25/2011
Sales Amount $26,094,500
Amount/Sq Ft $187.68
Prior Sale Amount $9,500,000
Prior Sales Date Apr ’88
Exterior Wall Brick

Share

February 2011 Sales of Interest

April 19th, 2011 No comments

1615 N Himes Ave

Address N. Himes Ave. Tampa, FL 33607
Property Type Warehouse
Sales Date 2/1/2011
Sales Amount $537,500
Amount/Sq Ft $53.59
Prior Sale Amount $304,200
Prior Sales Date 11/18/2004
Exterior Wall Metal

4920 W Cypress St

Address W. Cypress St. Tampa, FL 33607
Property Type Office Building
Sales Date 2/22/2011
Sales Amount $1,678,200
Amount/Sq Ft $58.54
Prior Sale Amount $1,650,000
Prior Sales Date 11/07/1995
Exterior Wall Stucco


1105 E Twiggs St

Address E.Twiggs St. Tampa, FL 33602
Property Type Office Building
Sales Date 2/28/2011
Sales Amount $2,100,000
Amount/Sq Ft $203.67
Prior Sale Amount $31,500,000
Prior Sales Date 12/28/2010
Exterior Wall Brick
Share

January 2011 Sales of Interest

March 3rd, 2011 1 comment

N 56th St Tampa FL 33617

Address N 56th St.
Property Type Fast Food
Sales Date 1/18/2011
Sales Amount $1,571,400
Amount/Sq Ft $483.21
Prior Sale Amount $685,000
Prior Sales Date 6/8/2010
Exterior Wall Brick

Temple Terrace Highway, Temple Terrace FL 33637

Address Temple Terrace Hwy
Property Type Shopping Center
Sales Date 1/26/2011
Sales Amount $3.3 million
Amount/Sq Ft $33.99
Prior Sale Amount N/A
Prior Sales Date N/A
Exterior Wall PreCast Panel
Share